home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Gigarom 1
/
Gigarom Macintosh Archives (Quantum Leap)(CDRM1080320)(1993).iso
/
FILES
/
HYP
/
H-I
/
HyperHackers.cpt
/
Hyper-Hackers Queue 1.0
/
card_12923.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1989-02-26
|
3KB
|
67 lines
-- card: 12923 from stack: in.0
-- bmap block id: 0
-- flags: 0000
-- background id: 3797
-- name:
-- part contents for background part 1
----- text -----
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuq@sun.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 88 9:00 PST
> Why has it been so successful ? - Simple! Danny Goodman's book is
> everything the Apple documentation is NOT.
This, I believe is on purpose. Not to force people to buy Goodman's book to
make money, but from the philosophy of Atkinson and his feelings about
software. Atkinson planned from the start to make HyperCard a gimme - a
piece of free software, either through Apple or through the other normal
channels like User Groups and Bulletin Boards. One factor to keep in mind
with this is that large electronic documentation sets aren't realistic in
this environment, and hypercard really, really needs a well written printed
manual. The only way to reconcile this is to make the software available for
downloading, and let the people who want it go buy the book at the
bookstore. Since they knew from the beginning that Goodman's book was going
to be the definitive reference, they didn't put lots of time and energy into
duplicating that information in the HyperCard manual they ship with,
especially when you realize that practically speaking, few Hypercard owners
are going to see the "official" manual, thanks to the way system software
gets passed around. The "official" manual is skimpy, but I'm not sure I
blame Apple for doing things the way they did it, especially since there IS
a good alternative source for the same information.
> A great idea, but calling featured authors "HyperStars" ?!?! - please....
Just as a side comment, one of the things that killed the Atari 800 machine
was Atari's insistence that in-house software writers were anonymous. At the
same time, third party firms like Activision were plastering the authors
name and picture on their stuff. Needless, most of Atari's best programmers
went to Activision, and the stuff Atari shipped was, um, garbage. Software
sales for Atari died off, which hit the company on the bottom line.
Atari's attitude was that programmers were employees. Activision's was that
they were artists. Guess who's closer to right? it may sound silly, but
if you don't keep your hackers happy, someone else will.
>Has anyone else heard of any similar use of HyperCard as a front end?
You should look at CompuServe's Navigator. It isn't writting in HyperCard,
but it could be. Wonderful way to spend money, and MUCH nicer than dealing
with CompuServe directly. These things will be standard fare on all
timesharing services in a couple of years, if the timesharing services are
interested in surviving.
> My question exactly. I thought of having HyperCard launch a terminal
> emulator program, but I think now it would be better to have an XCMD
> to trap the incoming ASCII string and import it as text into HC.
Better, do what Navigator does and replace the emulator.
-- part contents for background part 45
----- text -----
Re: Various